A message to Zeitgeist - Credible?
jmpeer: “I’m wondering where you get your information?
Where do you publish your sources?
I don’t acknowledge things until they’re indisputably proven,
and unfortunately, your sources, particularly with the debunking of
religion, are challenged quite a bit.
Little bits of evidence, testimonies, and reasoning aren’t enough.
You have to make your case clear beyond all doubt.
Who orchestrates your media and site?
You need to touch em both up.
Your general organization and presentation aren’t too effective,
as shiny and inspirational as you might thing it is,
you really do need to make them less doubtful, more organized, and less sketchy.
You need to actually prove your case and jump on it if it’s worth anything.
Gettin shit across really isn’t hard.”
Then jmpeer: You’re very rude and naive, especially for an admin, to assume I haven’t visited those materials before. What you’ve suggested is again irrelevant. I’m not talking about your pretty face. I’m talking about the little wart on the side of your pretty face. Perhaps you’re good at reading the context of things since stating it directly didn’t seem to phase you. Your failure to understand what I’m saying is a problem for you, not for my satisfaction.
Please reread my posts and try to understand what I have pointed out. And bear in mind your judgement isn’t exactly best when it comes to evaluating yourself, so think as if you were not a member on Zeitgeist.”
