— Zeitgeist Movement (@tzmglobal) March 3, 2019
Showing posts with label Biophily. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Biophily. Show all posts
Wednesday, January 1, 2020
Roxanne Meadows didn't raise a million dollars
Saturday, November 19, 2016
Wednesday, March 23, 2016
Resource Based Economy, Inc.
Active Venus, FL
Resource Based Economy, Inc. filed as a Domestic Non Profit Corporation in the State of Florida on Wednesday, March 23, 2016, according to public records filed with Florida Department of State.
2016- Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Net Assets:
- Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets:
2017
- Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Net Assets:
- Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets:
"Here are some suggestions:
1) Expose the banking fraud. Citibank, JP Morgan Chase and Bank of America are the most powerful controllers within the corrupt Federal Reserve system. It's time to boycott these institutions. If you have a bank account or a credit card with any of them, move your money to another bank. If you have a mortgage, refinance with another bank. If you own their stock, sell it. If you work for them, quit. This gesture will express contempt for true powers behind the private banking cartel, known as the Federal Reserve. And create awareness about the fraud of the banking system itself."
-Peter Joseph
Monday, April 1, 2013
Jacque Fresco's biography is in the works
We've nearly finished writing about Jacque's life, it'll be used by Wilson Hawthorne for the biography he's writing about him.— Roxanne Meadows (@RoxMeadows) May 11, 2013
A Biography of Jacque Fresco?
The Venus Project Needs $300,000 to write Jaque Fresco Biography!:
https://conspiracies.skepticproject.com/forum/5513/the-venus-project-needs-300000-to-write-jaque-fresco-biogr/
Monday, March 18, 2013
Monday, January 14, 2013
Nate Dinwiddie threatens People
— Man of Tomorrow (@FrescoFuture) April 22, 2017
Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Nathanael thinks Jacque Fresco is Superman
Man of Tomorrow is a fresh look at the life and ideas of renowned futurist, Jacque Fresco.
Director and Writer:
Nathanael DinwiddieTuesday, October 11, 2011
William Gazecki on Jacque Fresco
"It’s a 'lack of professional engagement', William Gazecki who in 2006 completed Future by Design, a feature-length profile of Jacque Fresco says, that has hurt Fresco the most. “The real missing link in Jacque’s world is having put Jacque to work,” Gazecki says, “[It’s] exemplified when people say: ‘Well, show me some buildings he’s built. And I don’t mean the domes out in Venus. I mean, let’s see an office building, let’s see a manufacturing plant, let’s see a circular city.’ And that’s where he should have been 30 years ago. He should have been applying his work, in the real world … [but] he’s not a collaborator, and I think that’s why he’s never had great public achievements.”Gazecki Commentary
These comments from Gazecki are more suited to the "Influence" section. The use of Gazecki's quotes in the way it currently presented is not very encyclopedic. It reads more like a newspaper. Perhaps these quotes should be summed up and paraphrased?--Biophily (talk) 01:18, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
Earl King, you keep moving the paragraph. It belongs better to the "Influence" subsection because Gazecki is explaining why Fresco has not been a large influence in architecture and society in general. Just because you want to strike the reader immediately with a negative sentiment does not make it the proper place for that paragraph. It's better to move it to the "Influence" subsection, and have the lead sentences of the criticism section be neither criticism nor praise. BLP's require balance, unlike other types of articles.--Biophily (talk) 01:36, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- I don't think so. You also used a false edit summary in the process of reverting. You also created a very funny sounding section called theoretical criticism and that is too odd a way to present things. You removed Gazecki's comment from the actual critical section where it belonged. It is a powerful and succinct statement about Fresco and unlike most of the fluff now in that section and honorific blessing type of material, it presents a different and direct view of Fresco from someone who made a film about him and knew him intimately because of that. So, burying information at the bottom in a badly phrased topic heading that has nothing to do with the critical value of what Gazecki said seems wrong for the article. It is a continuance of your former editing style which is not neutral. You removed and buried the information also twice with false edit summaries. You reverted this three times including your first revert. Earl King Jr. (talk) 04:45, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
Sunday, June 9, 2002
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)